Sean
Glennon has written a well-organized, cogent argument why Tom Brady is the best
quarterback in NFL History. He does this by comparing the statistics, both
regular season and post-season, as well as the long term success of other candidates’
respective teams versus Tom Brady. He also uses more subjective measures such
as talent around the quarterback and championship wins. He uses all of this
data and more to show that Tom Brady stacks up as the best ever.
The
chapters a broken down comparing Tom Brady to other great quarterbacks,
interspersed with breakdowns of each of Brady’s seasons and his team’s
accomplishments.
What
this book doesn’t do is trash the achievements of other quarterbacks. All the
quarterbacks presented in this book are rightfully considered the greatest that
ever played the game. You don’t hear the author trashing the achievements of
Peyton Manning, for example. In fact, the author lauds the achievements of the
other great quarterbacks to which he compares Brady.
Glennon
does such a great job of making his arguments I won’t rehash them here, but I
will make a few points on a couple of items in the book.
Peyton Manning
Tom
Brady vs. Payton Manning is the first chapter of the book that directly
compares Brady to another great quarterback and Tom Brady vs. Joe Montana is
the last one. That was brilliant placement of those two chapters as Manning
would be the current day quarterback to most likely get some strong arguments
in his favor, and Joe Montana, of course, many incorrectly consider the best
ever.
The
Peyton Manning chapter is very similar to some of the arguments I have made to
why Tom Brady really is a better quarterback than Manning and I’ll just throw
in a few comments here to say that I agree. First, championships do and should
matter in this evaluation. It’s not the only thing, but it is one thing that
should be looked at. At least the player’s and his team’s accomplishments in
post-season play should be strongly considered. And despite all the great
talent the Colts have had, for whatever reason, they really slump in the
playoffs and Manning doesn’t always perform that well when he gets there.
Second,
Manning's entire career has been spent with superior offensive talent. Manning
has had the luxury of a strong running game (Marshall Faulk and Edgerrin James)
most of his career, and a Hall of Fame bound receiver in Marvin Harrison and an
elite receiver in Reggie Wayne.
Brady,
on the other hand, has taken average receivers and offensive talent and led
them to three Super Bowls. But for a dropped pass that would have undoubtedly
been a game winning touchdown by the woebegone Reche Caldwell, Brady would have
lead a group of below average receivers to a Super Bowl.
And
what happens when Brady gets an elite receiving corps? 19-0, 50 touchdown
passes and a bevy of other offensive records. Granted the Patriots lost in the
Super Bowl that year, but the achievement is one that is still phenomenal. This
was followed by another Super Bowl appearance after the 2011 season.
Glennon
does a nice job of making these points, and more.
Joe Montana
I
think the chapter on Joe Montana is the one that really brings to light how
Brady is better than Joe Montana. Yes, the one thing Montana has over Brady is
four Super Bowl wins, and 4-0 at that, while Brady is 3-2. But I have never
heard anyone argue that Terry Bradshaw is the equal of Joe Montana and he is
4-0 in Super Bowls too.
But
when one looks over the long-term success of Montana’s teams and many of the
statistics, Montana clearly doesn’t stack up to Brady. And Montana had what
some consider the best receiver ever to play the game in Jerry Rice most of his
career, a strong running game, and a stout defense that usually ranked at the
top of the league. Being one of the most talent laden teams of that era the
49’ers probably should have made it to more than four Super Bowls, but they
didn’t.
Now
in the current salary cap era, no offense to a lot of Brady’s former teammates,
the Patriots have never assembled great offensive talent around Brady for much
of his tenure at quarterback. When they have the results speak for themselves
(now they just need to fix the defense).
Ben Roethlisberger
Big
Ben is not given his own chapter but he is mentioned with other current elite
quarterbacks. I hear a lot of people try to make the claim that Roethlisberger
is a Hall of Fame quarterback. He probably is based just on his team having won
two Super Bowls but they have also failed to make the playoffs frequently as
well. And Roethlisberger played poorly in two of the three Super Bowl
appearances (a win against the Seahawks and a loss against Green Bay).
The
Steelers won Super Bowl XL despite Roethlisberger’s poor play. He has the
distinction of being the quarterback on a winning Super Bowl team with the worst
passer rating, an abysmal 22.6. He threw two interceptions, one on a terrible
pass that set up the Seahawks for an easy touchdown. I suspect the poor play of
Big Ben is the reason the Steelers finally went to a trick play and had former
college quarterback Antwaan Randle-El throw a touchdown pass to Hines Ward.
I’m
not pointing this out to denigrate the accomplishments of Big Ben, but he is no
Tom Brady.
Conclusion
Now
I will quote from the last words of the book. This is not a spoiler because you
already know the book’s conclusion:
“And
the reality is the greatest quarterback in NFL history is not Peyton Manning,
not Bart Starr, not John Elway nor Dan Marino. It’s not Sammy Baugh or Otto
Graham. And no, it’s not even Joe Montana.”
When
you sit down and honestly and fairly review and compare the careers of the best
who ever played, you can only reach one conclusion: The greatest quarterback in
the history of the NFL is Tom Brady. Pure and simple.”